The Relationship Between the Degree of AI Cognition and Its Degree of Trust

Guanlin Feng

doi:10.54254/2753-8818/2025.GL25010

Theoretical and Natural ScienceOpen access

The Relationship Between the Degree of AI Cognition and Its Degree of Trust

Research Article

Open Access

The Relationship Between the Degree of AI Cognition and Its Degree of Trust

Guanlin Feng ^1*

¹ Shanghai Starriver Bilingual School, Shanghai, China, 201108

^*Corresponding author: fengguanlin2008@gmail.com

Published on 20 July 2025

TNS Vol.125

ISSN (Print): 2753-8826

ISSN (Online): 2753-8818

ISBN (Print): 978-1-80590-233-1

ISBN (Online): 978-1-80590-234-8

Download Cover

Abstract

This research explores the relationship between Artificial Intelligence (AI) literacy and trust in AI systems. As AI continues to be integrated into various aspects of daily life, understanding the connection between knowledge of AI and trust is crucial. The study develops a comprehensive AI literacy questionnaire, addressing key dimensions such as "Know and Understand AI," "Use and Apply AI," and "Evaluate and Create AI," alongside questions measuring the degree of trust in AI. The research finds a weak negative relationship between AI literacy and trust, which is different from existing literature that typically suggests a positive or neutral correlation. The results, though not statistically significant, highlight the importance of AI education and its potential role in shaping public trust. Despite limitations such as sample size and time constraints, the study offers valuable insights and contributes to the ongoing dialogue about AI literacy and trust. Future research, with a larger and more diverse sample, could help clarify these findings and further explore the interplay between AI literacy and trust across different populations and settings.

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, AI literacy, trust in AI, machine learning, AI education

View PDF

References

[1]. Eslami, M., et al. (2019). User attitudes towards algorithmic transparency and accountability. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1-22.

[2]. Hoff, K. A., & Bashir, M. (2015). Trust in automation: Integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Human Factors, 57(3), 407-422.

[3]. Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1), 50-80.

[4]. Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-13.

[5]. Miller, T. (2019). Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artificial Intelligence, 267, 1-38.

[6]. Ng, D. T. K., et al. (2021). AI literacy: Definition, teaching, and evaluation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(4), 747-765.

[7]. Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). Why should I trust you? Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1135-1144.

[8]. Shin, D. (2021). The effects of explainability and causability on perception, trust, and acceptance: Implications for explainable AI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 148, 102557.

[9]. Sundar, S. S. (2020). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility, 47-70.

[10]. Zhang, B., & Dafoe, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence: American attitudes and trends. Oxford University.

[11]. Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (3rd ed.). Pearson.

[12]. Esteva, A., et al. (2017). Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature, 542(7639), 115-118.

[13]. Ricci, F., Rokach, L., & Shapira, B. (2015). Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer.

[14]. Domingos, P. (2015). The Master Algorithm. Basic Books.

[15]. Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer.