The Impact of Network Cultural Mechanisms on Adolescent Mental Health: A Case Study of the Netflix Series Adolescence

Shaoyi Gu

doi:10.54254/2753-7048/2026.HT29859

Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public MediaOpen access

The Impact of Network Cultural Mechanisms on Adolescent Mental Health: A Case Study of the Netflix Series Adolescence

Research Article

Open Access

The Impact of Network Cultural Mechanisms on Adolescent Mental Health: A Case Study of the Netflix Series Adolescence

Shaoyi Gu ^1*

¹ University of Warwick

^*Corresponding author: gushaoyi1027@outlook.com

Published on 26 November 2025

LNEP Vol.122

ISSN (Print): 2753-7056

ISSN (Online): 2753-7048

ISBN (Print): 978-1-80590-553-0

ISBN (Online): 978-1-80590-554-7

Download Cover

Abstract

The psychological well-being of contemporary adolescents is heavily influenced by social media, particularly via algorithm-driven recommendations and virtual networks. This study explores how aspects of online culture, including misogyny, group polarization, and algorithmic amplification, impact adolescent psychological well-being and their views on gender roles. Through the use of the Netflix series Adolescence as a case study, this analysis applies Social Learning Theory, Objectification Theory, Attachment Theory, and Emotion Regulation Theory to evaluate the relevance of these frameworks in examining the series’ narrative, characters, and symbolic elements. The results indicate that toxic online communities exacerbate identity confusion, emotional regulation difficulties, and adherence to rigid gender norms among adolescents, especially in the absence of secure attachments. As such, these communities are closely linked to negative mental health outcomes. To this end, interventions should prioritize media literacy education, active parental guidance, and platform accountability to promote critical thinking, emotional resilience, and safer digital environments for young people.

Keywords:

Adolescent mental health, Media literacy, Online misogyny, Group polarization, Toxic masculinity

View PDF

References

[1]. Castells, M. (2009). The Rise of the Network Society. Wiley Online Library.

[2]. Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.

[3]. Baumgartner, J. C., Morris, J. S., & Walth, N. L. (2012). The Fey effect: Young adults, political humor, and perceptions of Sarah Palin in the 2008 presidential election campaign. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(1), 95-104.

[4]. Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community, revised edition: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. MIT press.

[5]. Ging, D. (2019). Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and masculinities, 22(4), 638-657.

[6]. Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 7(3), 321-326.

[7]. Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological bulletin, 140(4), 1073.

[8]. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Nelson-Hall.

[9]. Gross, J.J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26(1), 1-26.

[10]. Keles, B., McCrae, N., & Grealish, A. (2020). A systematic review: the influence of social media on depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents. International journal of adolescence and youth, 25(1), 79-93.

[11]. Nesi, J., Choukas-Bradley, S., & Prinstein, M. J. (2018). Transformation of adolescent peer relations in the social media context: Part 1—A theoretical framework and application to dyadic peer relationships. Clinical child and family psychology review, 21(3), 267-294.

[12]. Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. In Nebraska symposium on motivation. University of Nebraska press.

[13]. Connell, R.W. (2005). Masculinities. University of California Press.

[14]. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice Hall.

[15]. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140.

[16]. Fredrickson, B.L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173-206.

[17]. Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. Basic Books.

[18]. Jeong, S. H., Cho, H., & Hwang, Y. (2012). Media literacy interventions: A meta-analytic review. Journal of communication, 62(3), 454-472.

[19]. Collier, K. M., et al. (2016). Does parental mediation of media influence child outcomes? A meta-analysis on media time, aggression, substance use, and sexual behavior. Developmental psychology, 52(5), 798.

[20]. Livingstone, S., & Smith, P. K. (2014). Annual research review: Harms experienced by child users of online and mobile technologies: The nature, prevalence and management of sexual and aggressive risks in the digital age. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 55(6), 635-654.