The Dilemma of Investor Rights Protection in the Belt and Road Initiative and Institutional Reconstruction

Jingtong Zhang

doi:10.54254/2753-7048/2025.BR26008

Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public MediaOpen access

The Dilemma of Investor Rights Protection in the Belt and Road Initiative and Institutional Reconstruction

Research Article

Open Access

The Dilemma of Investor Rights Protection in the Belt and Road Initiative and Institutional Reconstruction

Jingtong Zhang ^1*

¹ Central South University

^*Corresponding author: 8103230519@csu.edu.cn

Published on 13 August 2025

LNEP Vol.110

ISSN (Print): 2753-7056

ISSN (Online): 2753-7048

ISBN (Print): 978-1-80590-297-3

ISBN (Online): 978-1-80590-298-0

Download Cover

Abstract

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has spurred overseas investment by Chinese enterprises. However, investors in host countries face risks of "regulatory takings" arising from fragmented environmental legislation and arbitrary enforcement, alongside systemic governance gaps due to ineffective regulatory oversight in host states. These issues underscore deficiencies in the investment protection regimes of BRI partner countries. Concurrently, the current Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanism exacerbates conflicts of interest between host states and investors by excessively prioritizing investor rights. This study focuses on the core issue of balancing investor rights protection with host states' public interests. Applying normative analysis, case studies, and comparative research methods, conducts an in-depth examination of the institutional dilemmas affecting investor rights protection under the BRI and their underlying causes. The research proposes that institutional reconstruction hinges on establishing a dynamic equilibrium framework: on the one hand, International Investment Agreements (IIAs) require optimization through clarifying indirect expropriation criteria, defining the scope of Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET), and incorporating exception clauses for social responsibilities and public interests; on the other hand, dispute resolution mechanisms should be innovated by exploring a multi-tiered settlement system integrating mediation and arbitration, while advancing the top-level design of a BRI Investment Protection Convention. This study aims to provide institutional solutions for reconciling investment protection with host states' regulatory sovereignty, thereby facilitating the rule of law and sustainable development of the Belt and Road Initiative.

Keywords:

Belt and Road Initiative, dispute settlement mechanism, governance restructuring, interest balancing, investor rights protection.

View PDF

References

[1]. Muminov, F. (2019) Protection of Foreign Investment in Central Asia. Russian Law Journal 7, 125-136.

[2]. Zheng, L.L. (2024) The Environmental Protection Dilemma of Green Overseas Investment under the Belt and Road Initiative and the Legal Countermeasures. Journal of Customs and Trade 45(3), 89-102.

[3]. Feng, S. and Shen, W. (2020) Calvo Is Back! Changing Sovereignty and Evolutionary Investment Law in a Leaving and Return of the State Paradigm. Journal of East Asia and International Law 13(2), 307-325.

[4]. Xiao, B. (2019) Environmental Risks of Outward Investment in BRI Countries and China's Legal Countermeasures. International Forum 21, 89-99.

[5]. Zhu, W.L. (2024) Construction of the Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanism of China-ASEAN Free Trade Area 3.0. Wuhan University International Law Review 8, 87-103.

[6]. Li, X. (2025) Evaluation of the Investment Facilitation for Development Agreement and China’s Countermeasures. International Business Research 46(1), 46-58.

[7]. Mo, J.J. and Gao, J.X. (2022) The Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanism under the Belt and Road Initiative. International Business Research 43(4), 63-73.

[8]. Liang, Y. (2022) Study on Soft Law Governance of China's Overseas Investment. Law Science (11), 174-192.

[9]. Feng, X.J. and Wang, C.H. (2022) China's Foreign Investment Law: Moving Toward Greater Liberalization? Penn State Journal of Law and International Affairs 10(2), 115-135.

[10]. Cabrera Colorado, O.F. and Lobatón Guzmán, E. (2023) The USMCA: An Innovative Approach to Investment Protection, Solving Some States' Concerns. American Review of International Arbitration 34(3), 559-580.