Structural Dilemmas in Labor Rights Protection and the Colonial Paradox of Global Governance

Xinkai Du

doi:10.54254/2753-7048/2025.LD25548

Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public MediaOpen access

Structural Dilemmas in Labor Rights Protection and the Colonial Paradox of Global Governance

Research Article

Open Access

Structural Dilemmas in Labor Rights Protection and the Colonial Paradox of Global Governance

Xinkai Du ^1*

¹ Dongyang Foreign Language School

^*Corresponding author: xinkaidu23@gmail.com

Published on 30 July 2025

LNEP Vol.107

ISSN (Print): 2753-7056

ISSN (Online): 2753-7048

ISBN (Print): 978-1-80590-273-7

ISBN (Online): 978-1-80590-274-4

Download Cover

Abstract

This article studies the systematic breakdown of labour rights protection in developing countries under globalization and unveils the mechanisms behind this breakdown by examining three structural dilemmas. It finds that national regulatory capacity is locked into a vicious circle of scarce resources and ineffective enforcement; legal systems institutionalise exploitation via biased rules; and capital in Global Value Chains (GVCs) undermines host-state sovereignty through pricing power, regulatory races to the bottom, and misallocation of resources. These three interlocking mechanisms cause the breakdown of labour rights. In reaction, the Human Rights Due Diligence (HRDD) mechanism seeks to overcome these dilemmas through parallel governance, transnational litigation, and piercing corporate liability. Yet it succumbs to a neocolonial paradox. Northern-dominated standard-setting persists alongside compensation cycles rooted in colonial history and geographically selective remedies. These practices collectively perpetuate global power asymmetries. The conclusion contends that although HRDD improves governance effectiveness to some extent, it does not break free from colonial logic. Global labour rights protection must transcend the current capital-centred paradigm.

Keywords:

Global Value Chains, Human Rights Due Diligence, Neocolonialism

View PDF

References

[1]. Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78104.

[2]. International Labour Organization. (2021). Labour inspection in ASEAN: Capacity challenges. ILO.

[3]. Clean Clothes Campaign. (2023). Stitched with lies: Auditing fraud in the garment industry.

[4]. ILO. (2023). Pakistan's occupational safety crisis: Compliance monitoring analysis 20182023 (Report No. ILO-PAK/2023/OSH-01).

[5]. De Sousa Santos, B. (2002). Toward a new legal common sense: Law, globalization, and emancipation (2nd ed.). Butterworths.

[6]. International Human Rights Commission. (2023). Passport confiscation in the Gulf: A survey of migrant workers. IHRC Press.

[7]. U.S. Department of Labor. (2023). Agriculture under the Fair Labor Standards Act (Fact Sheet #12).

[8]. Farmworker Justice. (2022). Excluded and at risk: Workers' compensation for farmworkers.

[9]. UNHCR. (2023). Thailand: Access to work for refugees.

[10]. Gereffi, G., & Lee, J. (2016). Economic and social upgrading in global value chains. International Labour Review, 155(1), 112.

[11]. ILO. (2020). Wage policy in Cambodia's garment sector: A delayed adjustment. ILO Country Office.

[12]. Human Rights Watch. (2022). "They don't like workers": Union suppression in Cambodia's export zones.

[13]. Transparency International Bangladesh. (2021). Allocation of labour inspection resources: A disparity study.

[14]. Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh. (2023). 10-year impact assessment report(pp. 812).

[15]. Transparency International Bangladesh. (2022). Governance challenges in the RMG sector (pp. 2325).

[16]. Cutler, A. C. (2003). Private Power and Global Authority: Transnational Merchant Law in the Global Political Economy. Cambridge University Press.

[17]. European Parliament. (2024). Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD): Final adopted text. PE-CONS 31/24.

[18]. Fraser, N. (2008). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. Columbia UP.

[19]. Sankaran, K. (2024). Colonial redress or colonial reinvestment? Journal of Human Rights Practice, 16(2), 812.

[20]. National Labor Relations Board. (2023). Joint employer standard (88 FR 73946), Sec. III.B.

[21]. H&M Group. (2024). Annual sustainability report 2023(pp. 1517).

[22]. Mayer, F. (2024). Pricing human rights into global value chains. World Development, 176, 1215.

[23]. Gereffi, G., & Mayer, F. (2024). The geographies of corporate accountability. Review of International Political Economy, 31(3), 799805.

[24]. Bilchitz, D. (2023). The imperial turn in human rights due diligence. Global Constitutionalism, 12(1), 45-67.

[25]. French National Assembly. (2024). Loi relative au devoir de vigilance des entreprises multinationales (Loi n 2024-567). Journal Officiel.

[26]. Walmart Inc. (2024). Global responsibility report (pp. 3233).