Taking Retreat as Progress: A Reexamination of American Appeasement Towards Japan in the 1930s
Research Article
Open Access
CC BY

Taking Retreat as Progress: A Reexamination of American Appeasement Towards Japan in the 1930s

Haoze Cen 1*
1 Nanjing Agricultural University
*Corresponding author: joey.phorcys@gmail.com
Published on 11 July 2025
Volume Cover
LNEP Vol.105
ISSN (Print): 2753-7056
ISSN (Online): 2753-7048
ISBN (Print): 978-1-80590-251-5
ISBN (Online): 978-1-80590-252-2
Download Cover

Abstract

In the early 1930s, as Japan's aggressive actions against China increasingly threatened American interests in the Asia-Pacific region, the United States adopted a policy of appeasement towards Japan's invasion, a policy that persisted until the outbreak of war in 1941. This paper reexamines the U.S. policy of appeasement towards Japan prior to the Pacific War, exploring the motivations and impacts behind this approach. Despite the very close economic ties between the U.S. and Japan before the war, the U.S.'s non-interventionist stance towards Japan's aggression in China still attracted significant global attention. The paper argues that U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt's implementation of the appeasement policy was aimed at overcoming domestic isolationist tendencies in order to more effectively engage in the war. By appeasing Japan and stimulating its aggressive ambitions, the policy sought to reverse the domestic isolationist trend, thereby creating a more favorable domestic political environment for U.S. war preparations.

Keywords:

Appeasement Policy, Isolationism, US-Japan Relation, Pre-Pacific War.

View PDF
Cen,H. (2025). Taking Retreat as Progress: A Reexamination of American Appeasement Towards Japan in the 1930s. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,105,1-14.

References

[1]. Ripsman, Norrin M. , and Jack S. Levy. “Wishful Thinking or Buying Time? The Logic of British Appeasement in the 1930s. ” International Security, Fall, 2008, Vol. 33, No. 2(Fall, 2008), pp, 148-181.

[2]. Qing, Tang. “The Evolution of US Policy towards Japan from 1931-1941. ” Journal of Jianghan University, 2005(04), 70-73.

[3]. Sagan, Scott D. . “The Origins of the Pacific War. ” The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Vol. 18, No. 4, The Origin and Prevention of Major Wars(Spring, 1988), pp. 893-922.

[4]. Treisman, Daniel. “Rational Appeasement. ” International Organization, Spring, 2004, Vol. 58, No. 2(Spring, 2004), pp. 345-373.

[5]. Iriye, Akiya. “The Origins of the Second World War in Asia and the Pacific. ” New York, NY: Routledge, 2013[1987].

[6]. Kennedy, Paul. “The Tradition of Appeasement in British Foreign Policy 1865-1939. ” British Journal of International Studies 2, No. 3(1976), 195-215.

[7]. Schroeder, Paul. “Munich and the British Tradition. ” The Historical Journal 19, No. 1(1976), 223-243.

[8]. Lobell, Steven E. . “The Challenge of Hegemony: Grand Strategy, Trade, and Domestic Politics. ” University of Michigan Press, 2009.

[9]. Putman, Robert D. . “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. ” International Organization, Vol. 42, No. 3(Summer, 1988), pp. 427-460.

[10]. Snyder, Jack. “Myth of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. ” Cornell University Press, 1991.

[11]. Gourevitch, Peter. “The second image reversed: the international sources of domestic politics. ” International Organization 32, 4, Autumn 1978.

[12]. Doenecke, Justus D. . “American Isolationism, 1939-1941. ”, The Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. V1, No. 3-4(Summer/fall 1982).

[13]. McCulloch, Tony. “US isolationism in the 1930s:democracy came under increasing threat in the 1930s. Why did the world’s most powerful democracy not seem interested?” 20th Century History Review(Vol. 2, Issue 2), Gale General OneFile, p 20.

[14]. “The Gallup Poll-Public Opinion 1935-1971. ” Vol 1 1935-1948.

[15]. “History of International Relations. ” Modern Volume, Peking University Press, 2001.

[16]. Heald, Stephen. “Documents on International Affairs, 1937. ” Oxford University Press for the Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1939.

[17]. “Sino-US Relations Compilation. ” No. 1, World Knowledge Publishing House, 1957.

[18]. Feis, Herbert. “Road to Pearl Harbor: The Coming of the War Between the United States and Japan. ” Princeton University Press, 1971.

[19]. “Selected Documents on Modern China's External Relations. ” 1840-1949, Volume 2, Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 1977.

[20]. Adams, Frederick C. . “The Road to Pearl Harbor: A Reexamination of American Far Eastern Policy, July 1937- December 1938. ” The Journal of American History, Vol. 58, No. 1(Jun. , 1971), pp. 73-92.

[21]. Hoffer, Peter C. . “American Businessman and the Japan Trade, 1931-1941: A Case Study of Attitude Formation. ” Pacific Historical Review, May, 1972, No. 2(May, 1972), pp. 189-205.

[22]. Iokibe, Makoto. “The History of US-Japan Relations, From Perry to the Present. ” Yuhikaku Publishing Co. Ltd, 2008.

[23]. de Betts, Ralph. “The United States of America, 1933-1937. ”

[24]. Morton, Louis. “War Plan Orange: Evolution of a strategy. ” World Politics, Vol. 11, No. 2(Jan. , 1959), pp. 221-250.

Cite this article

Cen,H. (2025). Taking Retreat as Progress: A Reexamination of American Appeasement Towards Japan in the 1930s. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,105,1-14.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities

ISBN: 978-1-80590-251-5(Print) / 978-1-80590-252-2(Online)
Editor: Enrique Mallen
Conference website: https://2024.icgpsh.org/
Conference date: 20 December 2024
Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Volume number: Vol.105
ISSN: 2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)