Determining the Copyright Holder for AI-Generated Content: Human Creator, AI System, or Platform?

Jiangchuan Ai

doi:10.54254/2753-7064/2025.HT28640

Communications in Humanities ResearchOpen access

Determining the Copyright Holder for AI-Generated Content: Human Creator, AI System, or Platform?

Research Article

Open Access

Determining the Copyright Holder for AI-Generated Content: Human Creator, AI System, or Platform?

Jiangchuan Ai ^1*

¹ The Education University of Hong Kong

^*Corresponding author: aijiangchuan@asu.edu.pl

Published on 28 October 2025

CHR Vol.93

ISSN (Print): 2753-7072

ISSN (Online): 2753-7064

ISBN (Print): 978-1-80590-483-0

ISBN (Online): 978-1-80590-484-7

Download Cover

Abstract

The popularity of AIGC has raised legal challenges regarding copyright ownership. This article aims to explore whether copyright should belong to human users, AI systems, or development platforms. The core issue of AIGC lies in the fact that its output lacks the "independent intent" and "creativity" required by copyright law. In response to this, international responses vary: the United States adheres to the "human author" principle, the European Union is exploring new frameworks, while China tends to position AI as an auxiliary tool. This article holds that copyright should belong to human creators because they play a decisive and leading role throughout the entire creative process. In essence, AI systems are advanced tools that cannot be independently created and do not have legal subject status. The role of the platform should be that of a manager responsible for content review, risk prevention, and control. To promote the adaptation of laws to technological development, this article suggests that legislation should clearly define the dominant position of human creators and increase the compliance responsibilities of platform providers. At the same time, it should retain a certain degree of flexibility and explore the possibility of recognizing certain rights enjoyed by developers or platforms in specific circumstances, in order to balance the rights and interests of creators with technological innovation.

Keywords:

AIGC, copyright ownership, human creators, platform responsibility

View PDF

References

[1]. Watiktinnakorn, C., Seesai, J. and Kerdvibulvech, C. (2023) Blurring the Lines: How AI Is Redefining Artistic Ownership and Copyright. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 3, 37.

[2]. Miernicki, M. and Ng, I. (2021) Artificial Intelligence and Moral Rights. AI & SOCIETY, 36, 319-323.

[3]. Saxena, V., Tamò-Larrieux, A., Van Dijck, G. and Spanakis, G. (2025) Responsible Guidelines for Authorship Attribution Tasks in NLP. Ethics and Information Technology, 27, 16-17.

[4]. Pasetti, M., et al. (2024) Technical, Legal, and Ethical Challenges of Generative Artificial Intelligence: An Analysis of the Governance of Training Data and Copyrights. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5, 193-198.

[5]. Senftleben, M. (2024) Protection Against Unfair Competition in the European Union: From Divergent National Approaches to Harmonized Rules on Search Result Rankings, Influencers and Greenwashing. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 19, 149-157.

[6]. Sun, J. and Jiang, Y. (2023) The “Author” of AI-Generated Content in China: A Legal Quandary in the Making. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 18, 801-809.

[7]. Sohn, K. and Kwon, O. (2020) Technology Acceptance Theories and Factors Influencing Artificial Intelligence-Based Intelligent Products. Telematics and Informatics, 47, 101324-101326.

[8]. Guadamuz, A. (2017) Artificial intelligence and copyright. WIPO Magazine, 5, 12-19.

[9]. Wang, T. and Chen, Y. (2024) Exploring Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) Applications in the Metaverse: Copyright and Rights Allocation. IET Blockchain, 12, 18-23.

[10]. Henderson, S., Zibarras, L. and Tysome, E. (2024) Who holds the copyright for AI-generated works? A review of the international legal landscape. AI and Ethics, 4, 807-817.