A Comparison of the Main Axis Architectural Design of the University of British Columbia and Tsinghua University: Cultural and Environmental Perspectives

Xiangyu Ren

doi:10.54254/2753-7064/2025.LC24968

Communications in Humanities ResearchOpen access

A Comparison of the Main Axis Architectural Design of the University of British Columbia and Tsinghua University: Cultural and Environmental Perspectives

Research Article

Open Access

A Comparison of the Main Axis Architectural Design of the University of British Columbia and Tsinghua University: Cultural and Environmental Perspectives

Xiangyu Ren ^1*

¹ University of British Columbia

^*Corresponding author: renxiangyubest@163.com

Published on 11 July 2025

CHR Vol.72

ISSN (Print): 2753-7072

ISSN (Online): 2753-7064

ISBN (Print): 978-1-80590-225-6

ISBN (Online): 978-1-80590-226-3

Download Cover

Abstract

This paper compares the main axis architectural designs of the University of British Columbia (UBC) and Tsinghua University from cultural and environmental perspectives. Both universities embody unique historical and cultural values, reflected through their spatial organization and architectural elements. UBC, located in Vancouver on the traditional territory of the Musqueam people, integrates modernist architecture with Indigenous art and sustainable design principles, highlighting themes of reconciliation, inclusivity, and ecological innovation. In contrast, Tsinghua University in Beijing exemplifies Chinese classical symmetry, Confucian values, and cultural heritage through its axial layout, historic buildings, and garden aesthetics. This research investigates how each campus uses its main axis to express cultural identity and environmental consciousness. It employs two theoretical frameworks—Unsettling Settler Colonialism and Palladio Virtuel—to analyze the symbolic and functional aspects of architectural design. The study finds that while UBC emphasizes multicultural integration and ecological responsibility, Tsinghua focuses on cultural continuity, order, and a harmonious relationship between architecture and nature. The findings suggest that campus main axis design is not only a spatial tool but also a medium for cultural expression and environmental engagement. This study contributes to current academic discourse on campus planning by offering comparative insights into how architecture negotiates between tradition, modernity, and sustainability.

Keywords:

campus architecture, cultural identity, sustainability, UBC, Tsinghua University

View PDF

References

[1]. Eisenman, Peter, and Matt Roman Hofer. (2012). Palladio Virtuel. New Haven: Yale University Press.

[2]. Tuck, Eve, and K. Wayne Yang. (2022). Decolonization is Not a Metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1): 1-40.

[3]. Walter C. Koerner Library, accessed December 18, 2024, https: //www.library.ubc.ca/archives/bldgs/koernerlibr.htm.

[4]. Jun Wang. (2015). The Cultural Landscape of Tsinghua University: Tradition and Modernity Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 13.

[5]. Peter Eisenman and Matt Roman Hofer. (2012). Palladio Virtuel. New Haven: Yale University Press, Preface.

[6]. Nest Catering & Conferences. “Nest Catering and Conferences - UBC.” June 23, 2023, https: //www.nestcatering.com/

[7]. Liu, Yishi. (2014). Building Guastavino Dome in China: A Historical Survey of the Dome of the Auditorium at Tsinghua University. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 3(2): 121–40.

[8]. Centre for Interactive Research on Sustainability (CIRS), accessed December 19, 2024, https: //www.library.ubc.ca/archives/bldgs/CIRS.html.

[9]. Jian Shen, Shubo Deng, and Jing Wu. (2021). Identifying Pollution Sources in Surface Water Using a Fluorescence Fingerprint Technique in an Analytical Chemistry Laboratory Experiment for Advanced Undergraduates. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(2): 932–40.