Climate Risk Premium and Corporate Debt Financing Costs: Evidence from China
Research Article
Open Access
CC BY

Climate Risk Premium and Corporate Debt Financing Costs: Evidence from China

Bingjie He 1*
1 University of Essex
*Corresponding author: jacquelinejm1307@outlook.com
Published on 19 November 2025
Volume Cover
AEMPS Vol.241
ISSN (Print): 2754-1177
ISSN (Online): 2754-1169
ISBN (Print): 978-1-80590-541-7
ISBN (Online): 978-1-80590-542-4
Download Cover

Abstract

This study aligns with China's “dual carbon” strategy, focusing on A-share companies listed on both the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges from 2009 to 2023. This timeframe encompasses both the preparatory phase preceding the strategy's implementation and its subsequent impacts. This empirical analysis examines the impact of climate-related risks on corporate debt financing costs, while also investigating the underlying roles of intermediary channels and regional differences in this phenomenon. The study reveals that climate risks significantly elevate corporate debt financing costs, a phenomenon summarized as the “climate risk premium.” This conclusion remains robust across multiple tests—including alternative variable measurements and sample portfolio adjustments. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that enterprises in central and western regions exhibit greater sensitivity to financing cost fluctuations induced by climate risks compared to their eastern counterparts. Mechanistic assessment further confirms that climate risks propagate primarily through two pathways: first, accelerated depreciation of fixed assets diminishes collateral value (asset valuation channel); second, disrupted carbon disclosure exacerbates information opacity (information channel). Notably, the intermediary effect of the asset valuation channel is particularly pronounced at present. This study not only expands the interdisciplinary frontier between climate economics and corporate finance research but also provides critical empirical evidence: it assists governments in formulating specialized green finance regulations, supports financial institutions in building models that reflect dynamic climate pricing, and incentivizes enterprises to strengthen adaptive strategies for addressing the climate crisis.

Keywords:

Climate risk, Corporate debt financing cost, Carbon information disclosure, Regional heterogeneity, Fixed asset depreciation

View PDF
He,B. (2025). Climate Risk Premium and Corporate Debt Financing Costs: Evidence from China. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,241,30-39.

References

[1]. Li, Z., & Huang, Y. (2024). Climate risk shocks and the “accelerator” effect on credit financing contraction. Finance Theory and Practice, 45(3), 2–10. https: //doi.org/10.16339/j.cnki.hdxbcjb.2024.03.001

[2]. Huang, H. H., Kerstein, J., & Wang, C. (2022). The impact of climate risk on firm performance and financing choices: An international comparison. In Crises and disruptions in international business: How multinational enterprises respond to crises (pp. 305–349). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[3]. Ginglinger, E., & Moreau, Q. (2023). Climate risk and capital structure. Management Science, 69(12), 7492–7516.

[4]. Lemma, T. T., Lulseged, A., & Tavakolifar, M. (2021). Corporate commitment to climate change action, carbon risk exposure, and a firm's debt financing policy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3919–3936.

[5]. Jung, J., Herbohn, K., & Clarkson, P. (2018). Carbon risk, carbon risk awareness and the cost of debt financing. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 1151–1171.

[6]. Wilby, R. L., et al. (2009). A review of climate risk information for adaptation and development planning. International Journal of Climatology: A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 29(9), 1193–1215.

[7]. Chen, S., Xu, L., & Wu, H. (2024). Theoretical explanation and implementation paths of green and low-carbon transformation of China’s industrial chains under the “dual carbon” targets. Guangdong Social Sciences, (5), 63–74+286.

[8]. Zhang, X., Wan, G., Zhang, J., et al. (2020). Digital economy, financial inclusion and inclusive growth. China Economist, 15(3), 92–105. https: //doi.org/10.19602/j.chinaeconomist.2020.05.07

[9]. He, X., & Ma, J. (2022). Impacts of carbon neutrality on macroeconomic development. Financial Forum, 27(5), 3–7. https: //doi.org/10.16529/j.cnki.11-4613/f.2022.05.008

[10]. Matsumura, E. M., Prakash, R., & Vera-Muñoz, S. C. (2014). Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures. The Accounting Review, 89(2), 695–724.

[11]. Li, J., Peng, Y., & Wang, W. (2023). Can green credit policies promote the development of green enterprises?—From the perspective of risk-taking. Financial Research, (3), 112–130.

[12]. Li, Z., & Qin, J. (2020). Financing constraints and liquidity provision of trade credit channels: Evidence from heterogeneous firms. Nankai Journal (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), (6), 59–70.

[13]. Du, J., & Ran, L. (2025). Spillover effects of peer climate risk disclosure: Evidence from corporate financing costs. Accounting Monthly, 46(16), 52–58. https: //doi.org/10.19641/j.cnki.42-1290/f.2025.16.008

Cite this article

He,B. (2025). Climate Risk Premium and Corporate Debt Financing Costs: Evidence from China. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,241,30-39.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of ICFTBA 2025 Symposium: Global Trends in Green Financial Innovation and Technology

ISBN: 978-1-80590-541-7(Print) / 978-1-80590-542-4(Online)
Editor: Lukáš Vartiak, Sun Huaping
Conference date: 20 November 2025
Series: Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
Volume number: Vol.241
ISSN: 2754-1169(Print) / 2754-1177(Online)