SDGs, ESG Risk and Firm Operations--Evidence from S&P 500 Companies
Research Article
Open Access
CC BY

SDGs, ESG Risk and Firm Operations--Evidence from S&P 500 Companies

Yalin Zhou 1* Xiaohui Tang 2, Yihan Wang 3
1 University of Birmingham
2 Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
3 Xiamen University
*Corresponding author: yxz1334@student.bham.ac.uk
Published on 9 September 2025
Journal Cover
AEMPS Vol.215
ISSN (Print): 2754-1177
ISSN (Online): 2754-1169
ISBN (Print): 978-1-80590-357-4
ISBN (Online): 978-1-80590-358-1
Download Cover

Abstract

This research collects and analyses the past data on Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in S&P 500 companies and its relationship with Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) Risk and firm operations. Our research creates a new standard to record the SDGs mentioned in companies’ official websites and reports. Firstly, this study finds that SDGs have a strong explanatory power on ESG risk while they still have some differences. Secondly, Quality Education and Life below Water both have a positive effect on the Return on Equity of the companies, while Life on Land has a negative effect. Finally, for Tax to Earnings before Tax, this research finds that Zero Hunger, Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure, and Climate Action all have a positive effect on companies. In contrast, there is a negative effect on doing projects of Gender Equality and Partnership for the Goals. This research could give a reference for the companies, especially when they decide to plan to develop in sustainable areas, which could show a relatively comprehensive reference on their future short and long-term programs. It could also provide some thoughts and conclusions on the SDGs area, which give some ideas for researchers who will study this in the future.

Keywords:

SDGs, ESG, return on equity (ROE), tax to earning before tax (TAXTOEBT).

View PDF
Zhou,Y.;Tang,X.;Wang,Y. (2025). SDGs, ESG Risk and Firm Operations--Evidence from S&P 500 Companies. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,215,43-53.

References

[1]. Institute, G. & A. (2021). 92% of S& P 500® Companies and 70% of Russell 1000® Companies Published Sustainability Reports in 2020, G& A Institute Research Shows. GlobeNewswire News Room. https: //www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2021/11/16/2335435/0/en/92-of-S-P-500-Companies-and-70-of-Russell-1000-Companies-Published-Sustainability-Reports-in-2020-G-A-Institute-Research-Shows.html

[2]. Madison, N., & Schiehll, E. (2021). The Effect of Financial Materiality on ESG Performance Assessment. Sustainability, 13(7), 3652.

[3]. United Nations. (2024). The 17 Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations; United Nations. https: //sdgs.un.org/goals

[4]. Van der Waal, J. W. H., & Thijssens, T. (2020). Corporate involvement in Sustainable Development Goals: Exploring the territory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252(1), 119625.

[5]. WBCSD. (2017). Better business, better world. World Business Council for Sustainable Development. WBCSD. https: //www.wbcsd.org/resources/ceo-guide-to-the-sdgs/

[6]. Bogoviz, A. V., Lobova, S. V., & Alekseev, A. N. (2022). The Concept of Corporate Social Responsibility Based on Integrating the SDGs into Corporate Strategies: International Experience and the Risks for Profit. Risks, 10(6), 117.

[7]. Dyllick, T., & Muff, K. (2016). Clarifying the Meaning of Sustainable Business. Organization & Environment, 29(2), 156–174.

[8]. Fortanier, F., & van Wijk, J. (2010). Sustainable tourism industry development in sub-Saharan Africa: Consequences of foreign hotels for local employment. International Business Review, 19(2), 191–205.

[9]. van Zanten, J. A., & van Tulder, R. (2018). Multinational enterprises and the Sustainable Development Goals: An institutional approach to corporate engagement. Journal of International Business Policy, 1(3-4), 208–233.

[10]. Rosati, F., & Faria, L. G. D. (2019). Business contribution to the Sustainable Development Agenda: Organizational factors related to early adoption of SDG reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(3), 588–597.

[11]. Li, Q., Luo, W., Wang, Y., & Wu, L. (2013). Firm performance, corporate ownership, and corporate social responsibility disclosure in China. Business Ethics: A European Review, 22(2), 159–173.

[12]. Khan, H. (2010). The effect of corporate governance elements on corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting. International Journal of Law and Management, 52(2), 82–109.

[13]. Sharif, M., & Rashid, K. (2013). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting: an empirical evidence from commercial banks (CB) of Pakistan. Quality & Quantity, 48(5), 2501–2521.

[14]. Rao, A., Dagar, V., Sohag, K., Dagher, L., & Tanin, T. I. (2023). Good for the planet, good for the wallet: The ESG impact on financial performance in India. Finance Research Letters, 56(104093).

[15]. Lassala, C., Blat, M. O., & Navarrete, S. R. (2021). The financial performance of listed companies in pursuit of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34(1), 427–449. Tandfonline.

Cite this article

Zhou,Y.;Tang,X.;Wang,Y. (2025). SDGs, ESG Risk and Firm Operations--Evidence from S&P 500 Companies. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,215,43-53.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Financial Technology and Business Analysis

ISBN: 978-1-80590-357-4(Print) / 978-1-80590-358-1(Online)
Editor: Lukáš Vartiak
Conference website: https://2025.icftba.org/
Conference date: 12 December 2025
Series: Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
Volume number: Vol.215
ISSN: 2754-1169(Print) / 2754-1177(Online)