Research on the Impact of VAT Carryover Refund Policy on Corporate "Greenwashing" Behavior
Research Article
Open Access
CC BY

Research on the Impact of VAT Carryover Refund Policy on Corporate "Greenwashing" Behavior

Ziyi Yan 1*
1 Shandong University of Finance and Economics
*Corresponding author: 15606447102@163.com
Published on 30 July 2025
Volume Cover
AEMPS Vol.206
ISSN (Print): 2754-1177
ISSN (Online): 2754-1169
ISBN (Print): 978-1-80590-295-9
ISBN (Online): 978-1-80590-296-6
Download Cover

Abstract

Greenwashing behavior leads to environmental and economic inefficiencies, seriously hindering sustainable economic development. The introduction of the VAT carry-forward tax refund policy in China in 2018 offers the possibility of reducing the overall level of greenwashing in the market. This paper uses the data of non-financial listed companies on the A-share market from 2012 to 2022 as samples, and employs a difference-in-differences model to study the impact of the VAT carry-forward tax refund policy on the greenwashing behavior of Chinese enterprises. A mediating model is also established to explore the influencing mechanism. The conclusion is that the implementation of the VAT carry-forward tax refund policy, by promoting green innovation among enterprises, has to some extent curbed their greenwashing behavior. Enterprises that are state-owned, located in the central and western regions, and have a higher capital intensity are more affected by this policy, and the inhibitory effect on their greenwashing behavior is more pronounced.

Keywords:

Value-added tax carry-forward refund, Greenwashing, Green innovation

View PDF
Yan,Z. (2025). Research on the Impact of VAT Carryover Refund Policy on Corporate "Greenwashing" Behavior. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,206,66-75.

References

[1]. Huang Songbing, Xie Xiaojun, Zhou Huifen. The "Isomorphic" Behavior of Corporate Greenwashing [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2020, 30(11): 139-150.

[2]. Zhang D. Green financial system regulation shock and greenwashing behaviors: Evidence from Chinese firms [J]. Energy Economics, 2022, 111: 106064.

[3]. Huang Songbing, Chu Fang. Does Third-Party Verification Help to Suppress Corporate "Greenwashing"? [J]. Chinese Certified Public Accountants, 2021, (08): 38-42. DOI: 10.16292/j.cnki.issn1009-6345.2021.08.009.

[4]. Cao J, Faff R, He J, et al. Who's greenwashing via the media and what are the consequences? Evidence from China [J]. Abacus, 2022, 58(4): 759-786.

[5]. Lee M T, Raschke R L. Stakeholder legitimacy in firm greening and financial performance: What about greenwashing temptations? ☆ [J]. Journal of Business Research, 2023, 155: 113393.

[6]. Zhang D. Can environmental monitoring power transition curb corporate greenwashing behavior? [J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2023, 212: 199-218.

[7]. He L, Gan S, Zhong T. The impact of green credit policy on firms’ green strategy choices: green innovation or green-washing? [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29(48): 73307-73325.

[8]. Ruiz-Blanco S, Romero S, Fernandez-Feijoo B. Green, blue or black, but washing–What company characteristics determine greenwashing? [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2022, 24(3): 4024-4045.

[9]. Xie Y, Qin J, Jin Z, et al. VAT Neutrality and Corporate Cash Holdings—Based on the Research of Uncredited VAT Refund Policy [J]. China Finance and Economic Review, 2023, 12(2): 49-71.

[10]. Yue Shumin, Xiao Chunming. Can VAT carry-forward tax refunds alleviate enterprises' financing constraints? - Empirical evidence based on cash-cash flow sensitivity [J]. Finance and Trade Economics, 2023, 44(01): 51-67. DOI: 10.19795/j.cnki.cn11-1166/f.2023.01.003.

[11]. Zhang D. Are firms motivated to greenwash by financial constraints? Evidence from global firms' data [J]. Journal of international financial management & accounting, 2022, 33(3): 459-479.

[12]. Wang H, Yang J, Zhu N. Does Tax Incentives Matter to Enterprises’ Green Technology Innovation? The Mediating Role on R&D Investment [J]. Sustainability, 2024, 16(14): 5902.

[13]. Zhang Ming, Jiang Ou Chen, Cai Zhiqiang. Value-added Tax Carryforward Tax Rebate Policy and Enterprise Green Innovation [J]. Accounting and Finance Monthly, 2025, 46(08): 52-61. DOI: 10.19641/j.cnki.42-1290/f.2025.08.008.

[14]. Cai Weixian, Shen Xiaoyuan, Li Bingcai, et al. The Innovative Incentive Effect of VAT Carryforward Tax Rebate Policy [J]. Finance Research, 2022, (05): 31-48. DOI: 10.19477/j.cnki.11-1077/f.2022.05.005.

[15]. Li Yifei. VAT Carryforward Tax Rebate and Enterprise Human Capital Upgrading [J]. World Economy, 2023, 46(12): 115-140. DOI: 10.19985/j.cnki.cassjwe.2023.12.007.

[16]. Liu Bai, Wang Xinzhu. The "Risk Compensation" Effect of Enterprise Green Innovation on Stock Returns [J]. Economic Management, 2021, 43(07): 136-157. DOI: 10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2021.07.009.

[17]. Ma Y, Feng G F, Yin Z, et al. ESG disclosures, green innovation, and greenwashing: All for sustainable development? [J]. Sustainable Development, 2025, 33(2): 1797-1815.

Cite this article

Yan,Z. (2025). Research on the Impact of VAT Carryover Refund Policy on Corporate "Greenwashing" Behavior. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,206,66-75.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of ICEMGD 2025 Symposium: Digital Transformation in Global Human Resource Management

ISBN: 978-1-80590-295-9(Print) / 978-1-80590-296-6(Online)
Editor: Florian Marcel Nuţă Nuţă, An Nguyen
Conference date: 26 September 2025
Series: Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
Volume number: Vol.206
ISSN: 2754-1169(Print) / 2754-1177(Online)