Track-Centric Machine Learning for 24-Hour Peak-Intensity Forecasting of Western North Pacific Typhoons
Research Article
Open Access
CC BY

Track-Centric Machine Learning for 24-Hour Peak-Intensity Forecasting of Western North Pacific Typhoons

Yaoxiang Yu 1*
1 James B. Conant High School, Hoffman Estates, Illinois, United States
*Corresponding author: Andrew.yuyx@gmail.com
Published on 22 October 2025
Journal Cover
ACE Vol.196
ISSN (Print): 2755-273X
ISSN (Online): 2755-2721
ISBN (Print): 978-1-80590-451-9
ISBN (Online): 978-1-80590-452-6
Download Cover

Abstract

This study forecasts tropical-cyclone peak intensity 24 hours in advance using a parsimonious, track-centric feature set. From 400 Western North Pacific storms (2012–2025), standardized pre-peak histories are constructed from 37 three-hourly coordinates and augmented with month, initial wind and pressure, and 24-hour prior wind and pressure. Best-track records provide targets for peak maximum sustained wind and minimum central pressure, and models are assessed on a temporally held-out cohort of 151 post-2020 storms. Compared with a linear baseline, nonlinear learners substantially improve accuracy for peak wind (R² ≈ 0.82–0.83; RMSE ≈ 16.3–16.6 kt versus 22.8 kt) and for minimum pressure, where gradient-boosted trees perform best (R² ≈ 0.81; RMSE ≈ 13.2 hPa). Stratified analyses show consistent gains across months, latitude bands, and intensity classes, though errors increase for major and super typhoons. Interpretation of model behavior indicates that 24-hour prior wind and pressure dominate predictive skill, while latitude and longitude primarily modulate outcomes rather than acting as strong main effects. The approach is fast, portable, and interpretable, offering a low-latency prior when richer environmental or satellite inputs are unavailable.

Keywords:

Tropical cyclones, typhoons, machine learning, neural network

View PDF
Yu,Y. (2025). Track-Centric Machine Learning for 24-Hour Peak-Intensity Forecasting of Western North Pacific Typhoons. Applied and Computational Engineering,196,14-23.

References

[1]. A. M. F. Lagmay et al., “Devastating storm surges of Typhoon Haiyan, ” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 11, pp. 1–12, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.10.006.

[2]. “Typhoon Yagi killed 318 people, damage reaches $3.3 billion, ” vietnamnews.vn. Accessed: Oct. 05, 2025. [Online]. Available: https: //vietnamnews.vn/society/1663938/typhoon-yagi-killed-318-people-damage-reaches-3-3-billion.html

[3]. X. Bi, J. Liu, and Y. Duan, “Review of Artificial Intelligence Application in Typhoon Forecasting, ” Trop. Cyclone Res. Rev., p. S2225603225000311, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.tcrr.2025.07.005.

[4]. R. Chen, W. Zhang, and X. Wang, “Machine Learning in Tropical Cyclone Forecast Modeling: A Review, ” Atmosphere, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 676, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.3390/atmos11070676.

[5]. H. Xu, Y. Zhao, Z. Dajun, Y. Duan, and X. Xu, “Exploring the typhoon intensity forecasting through integrating AI weather forecasting with regional numerical weather model, ” Npj Clim. Atmospheric Sci., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 38, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41612-025-00926-z.

[6]. A. S. Albahri et al., “A systematic review of trustworthy artificial intelligence applications in natural disasters, ” Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 118, p. 109409, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2024.109409.

[7]. A. Mosavi, P. Ozturk, and K. Chau, “Flood Prediction Using Machine Learning Models: Literature Review, ” Water, vol. 10, no. 11, p. 1536, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.3390/w10111536.

[8]. K. M. Asim, A. Idris, T. Iqbal, and F. Martínez-Álvarez, “Earthquake prediction model using support vector regressor and hybrid neural networks, ” PLOS ONE, vol. 13, no. 7, p. e0199004, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199004.

[9]. J. Buch, A. P. Williams, C. S. Juang, W. D. Hansen, and P. Gentine, “SMLFire1.0: a stochastic machine learning (SML) model for wildfire activity in the western United States, ” Geosci. Model Dev., vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 3407–3433, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.5194/gmd-16-3407-2023.

[10]. L. Jin, C. Yao, and X.-Y. Huang, “A Nonlinear Artificial Intelligence Ensemble Prediction Model for Typhoon Intensity, ” Mon. Weather Rev., vol. 136, no. 12, pp. 4541–4554, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1175/2008MWR2269.1.

[11]. F. Meng, Y. Yao, Z. Wang, S. Peng, D. Xu, and T. Song, “Probabilistic forecasting of tropical cyclones intensity using machine learning model, ” Environ. Res. Lett., vol. 18, no. 4, p. 044042, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/acc8eb.

[12]. H. Liu et al., “A Hybrid Machine Learning/Physics‐Based Modeling Framework for 2‐Week Extended Prediction of Tropical Cyclones, ” J. Geophys. Res. Mach. Learn. Comput., vol. 1, no. 3, p. e2024JH000207, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1029/2024JH000207.

[13]. X.-Y. Xu, M. Shao, P.-L. Chen, and Q.-G. Wang, “Tropical Cyclone Intensity Prediction Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network, ” Atmosphere, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 783, May 2022, doi: 10.3390/atmos13050783.

Cite this article

Yu,Y. (2025). Track-Centric Machine Learning for 24-Hour Peak-Intensity Forecasting of Western North Pacific Typhoons. Applied and Computational Engineering,196,14-23.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of CONF-MLA 2025 Symposium: Intelligent Systems and Automation: AI Models, IoT, and Robotic Algorithms

ISBN: 978-1-80590-451-9(Print) / 978-1-80590-452-6(Online)
Editor: Hisham AbouGrad
Conference date: 12 November 2025
Series: Applied and Computational Engineering
Volume number: Vol.196
ISSN: 2755-2721(Print) / 2755-273X(Online)