Detecting the strange: automatic recognition and evaluation of defamiliarization in modernist poetry
Research Article
Open Access
CC BY

Detecting the strange: automatic recognition and evaluation of defamiliarization in modernist poetry

Ziyi Yang 1*
1 Department of Computer Science, Central South University
*Corresponding author: 8208240708@csu.edu.cn
Published on 24 September 2025
Journal Cover
AEI Vol.16 Issue 9
ISSN (Print): 2977-3911
ISSN (Online): 2977-3903
Download Cover

Abstract

This study addresses the long-standing gap between literary theory and computational modeling by focusing on defamiliarization, a central technique in modernist poetics. While defamiliarization has been extensively theorized in literary studies, its computational treatment remains limited due to its semantic complexity and subjective nature. To operationalize this phenomenon, the research introduces MelPoet, a poetics-informed neural architecture adapted from MelBERT. Two tasks are formulated: defamiliarization identification as binary classification, and defamiliarization scoring as regression of estrangement intensity. A curated dataset of modernist poetry and control texts was annotated for both presence and degree of defamiliarization. Experimental results demonstrate that MelPoet substantially outperforms strong baselines in both classification accuracy and scoring correlation, confirming the efficacy of its theory-driven design. This work not only advances computational methods for modelling figurative language but also provides a systematic framework for integrating literary concepts into natural language processing, thereby opening new avenues for large-scale, data-driven analysis of poetic style.

Keywords:

Natural Language Processing(NLP), defamiliarization, MelBERT, modernist poetry

View PDF
Yang,Z. (2025). Detecting the strange: automatic recognition and evaluation of defamiliarization in modernist poetry. Advances in Engineering Innovation,16(9),1-5.

References

[1]. Shklovsky, V. (1965). Art as technique. InL. T. Lemon & M. J. Reis (Trans.), Russian formalist criticism: Four essays(pp. 3-24). University of Nebraska Press.

[2]. Eliot, T. S. (2003). The waste land. InF. Kermode (Ed.), The waste land and other poems(pp. 51-85). Penguin Classics.

[3]. Pound, E. (1990). Personae: The Collected Poems of Ezra Pound.New Directions.

[4]. Choi, M., Lee, S., Choi, E., Park, H., Lee, J., Lee, D., & Lee, J. (2021). MelBERT: Metaphor detection via contextualized late interaction using metaphorical identification theories. arXiv. https: //arxiv.org/abs/2104.13615.

[5]. Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and poetics. InT. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language(pp. 350-377). MIT Press.

[6]. Jia, K., & Li, R. (2024). Metaphor detection with context enhancement and curriculum learning. InProceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies(Vol. 1: Long Papers) (pp. 2726-2737). Association for Computational Linguistics.

[7]. Stowe, K., Luan, Y., Bhatia, A., Gung, J., & Peng, S. (2024). Curriculum Learning for Metaphor Detection. InProceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies(NAACL 2024)(pp. 7392-7406). Association for Computational Linguistics.

[8]. Jia, K., Wu, Y., Liu, M., & Li, R. (2024). Curriculum-style data augmentation for llm-based metaphor detection. arXiv. https: //arxiv.org/abs/2412.02956.

[9]. Memon, M. Q., Banbhrani, S. K., Akhter, M. N., Noureen, F., & Mehreen, F. (2024). Detecting sarcasm in social media posts using transformer-based language models with contextual and sentiment-aware features.Spectrum of Engineering Sciences, 2(5), 534–549.

[10]. Badathala, N., Kalarani, A. R., Siledar, T., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2023). A match made in heaven: A multi-task framework for hyperbole and metaphor detection. InProceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics.

[11]. Hessel, J., Marasović, A., Hwang, J. D., Lee, L., Da, J., Zellers, R., Mankoff, R., & Choi, Y. (2022). Do androids laugh at electric sheep? Humor “understanding” benchmarks from the new yorker caption contest. arXiv. https: //arxiv.org/abs/2209.06293

[12]. Jakobson, R. (1987). Language in literature (K. Pomorska & S. Rudy, Eds.). Harvard University Press.

[13]. Gao, G., Choi, E., Choi, Y., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018). Neural metaphor detection in context. arXiv. https: //arxiv.org/abs/1808.09653.

[14]. Tsvetkov, Y., Boytsov, L., Gershman, A., Nyberg, E., & Dyer, C. (2014). Metaphor detection with cross-lingual model transfer. InProceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics(Vol. 1: Long Papers) (pp. 248-258). Association for Computational Linguistics.

Cite this article

Yang,Z. (2025). Detecting the strange: automatic recognition and evaluation of defamiliarization in modernist poetry. Advances in Engineering Innovation,16(9),1-5.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

About volume

Journal: Advances in Engineering Innovation

Volume number: Vol.16
Issue number: Issue 9
ISSN: 2977-3903(Print) / 2977-3911(Online)